Challenging Credible Fear Interview and Bond Hearing Delays

Padilla v. ICE, No. 2:18-cv-928 MJP (W.D. Wash. filed June 25, 2018)

STATUS:
Settled

Asylum seekers detained after entering the United States are entitled to prompt and fair credible fear interviews and, for those found to have credible asylum claims, bond hearings. This case challenges the punitive practice of keeping asylum seekers in custody for weeks or months without access to credible fear interviews or bond hearings and the lack of basic procedural protections—like hearing transcripts and written decisions—in bond hearings, as well as whether asylum seekers must bear the burden of proof in bond proceedings.

The case was filed as a class action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The district court judge rejected the Defendants' attempt to dismiss the case on jurisdictional grounds and certified two nationwide classes of certain individuals seeking credible fear interviews and post-credible fear interview bond hearings. Plaintiffs are represented by the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, the American Immigration Council, the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, and the American Civil Liberties Union.

In April 2019, just after the court ordered the government to provide qualifying individuals with bona fide asylum claims with prompt bond hearings, Attorney General Barr issued a decision in Matter of M-S-, 27 I&N 509 (AG 2019), that would have eliminated bond hearings altogether for Padilla bond hearing class members.  The district court issued a decision preventing Matter of M-S- from taking effect and affirming that the government must either to provide qualifying individuals with bona fide asylum claims with prompt bond hearings before an immigration judge with a set of procedural protections within seven days of their request or to release them from detention.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the preliminary injunction in part, requiring the government to provide class members with bond hearings. Subsequently, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the case to allow for further proceedings.

However, in June 2022, the Supreme Court issued a decision in another case, Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez, which held that an immigration statute barred class-wide injunctive relief related to the implementation of the detention provisions in the immigration statute—and overruled the Ninth Circuit’s decision finding that an injunction was not barred in this case.

On July 29, 2022, the preliminary injunction was vacated pursuant to an order from the Ninth Circuit. On January 5, 2024, the district court approved a partial settlement to resolve the credible fear class claims. For more information see Practice Alert: Padilla v. ICE and Delays in Credible Fear Interviews. The bond hearing class claims remain pending. 

Follow this case:

  • Last modified: 
    January 8, 2024
    Publication Date: 
    January 8, 2024
    The practice alert explains the scope of a class settlement agreement in Padilla v. ICE that provides protections for detained asylum seekers who face prolonged delays before receiving their credible fear interviews.
August 2, 2022

For almost two decades, asylum seekers taken into Border Patrol custody who passed a “credible fear” interview have been eligible to seek release from detention on bond while they go through the...

July 3, 2019

Attorney General William Barr announced in April 2019 plans to eliminate bond hearings for immigrants who pass an asylum screening interview after entering the United States. This would have...

April 9, 2019

Asylum seekers are often imprisoned in immigration detention for weeks or months before they can ask a judge to release them, even though they’re entitled to bond hearings. But this injustice may...

August 24, 2018

Earlier this year, the Trump administration launched its “zero tolerance” policy, aimed at punishing immigrants, including asylum seekers, who enter the United States without authorization. Among...

  • March 27, 2020
    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has upheld a ruling blocking a Trump administration policy that categorically denies bond hearings to asylum seekers. The case is Padilla v. ICE.
  • July 22, 2019
    A federal appeals court ruled that asylum seekers must continue to receive bond hearings while the court considers the Trump administration’s appeal to deny bond hearings with procedural protections to asylum seekers.
  • July 2, 2019
    A federal court has blocked a Trump administration policy that categorically denies bond hearings to asylum-seekers. The policy, announced April 16 by Attorney General William Barr, targeted asylum-seekers whom immigration officers previously determined have a “credible fear” of persecution or torture if returned to the places they fled. The American Immigration Council, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, and American Civil Liberties Union challenged the policy with the lawsuit Padilla v. ICE.
  • May 2, 2019
    The American Immigration Council, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, and The American Civil Liberties Union, filed a proposed amended complaint in federal court today in order to challenge the Trump administration’s new policy that categorically denies bond hearings to asylum seekers. The policy, announced April 16 by Attorney General William Barr, targets asylum seekers whom immigration officers previously determined have a “credible fear” of persecution or torture if returned to the places they fled.
  • April 16, 2019
    In a decision today, Attorney General William Barr ruled that individuals with valid protection asylum claims who entered between ports of entry no longer are eligible for release on bond by an immigration judge. The decision could result in the unnecessary detention of thousands more individuals each year, despite the enormous financial and human costs. With the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and the ACLU, the American Immigration Council intends to challenge the new decision.
  • April 5, 2019
    In a groundbreaking decision, a federal judge in Seattle dealt a blow to the government’s campaign to deter and obstruct asylum seekers applying for protection in the United States. Judge Marsha Pechman ordered the government to provide certain individuals with bona fide asylum claims either a bond hearing before an immigration judge within seven days of their request or to release them from detention.
  • March 7, 2019
    A federal district court in Seattle, Washington has certified two nationwide classes of detained asylum seekers who are challenging the government’s delays in providing asylum interviews and bond hearings.
  • December 13, 2018
    A federal district court in Seattle, Washington issued an order rejecting the government’s arguments that recent asylum seekers who enter the United States without immigration status are not entitled to constitutional protections.
  • September 21, 2018
    Yesterday, plaintiffs in an ongoing lawsuit challenging the U.S. government’s targeted efforts to obstruct asylum seekers filed a motion for preliminary injunction demanding timely bond hearings that comport with due process.

Most Read

  • Publications
  • Blog Posts
  • Past:
  • Trending